Re: Would voters be ready to invest in Medicare4All with a federal sales taxes? RickC, the FICA tax only levied upon employees, is the most regressive of federal government taxes and it’s levied only upon people that are employees. Employees are the majority of among our nation’s most affordable income earners. Both FICA and general sales fees are flat graded taxes, but FICA taxes upon individuals’ income are levied upon employees whole gross wages.
For almost all employees, (specially the most affordable earning employees), income is effectively their whole earnings. FICA tax upon wages is certainly more regressive than a general sales tax. As I described, transforming any proportion of income tax to be always a general sales tax, would be of no greater, but possibly be of a smaller regressive tax system.
A general sales tax is effectively taxes upon all individuals’ incomes, which excludes their transfers of wealth, which includes some cost savings and investments. Savings are delayed spending or investment. Investments promote our future GDP. Currently, the majority of those same exchanges of wealth are income not subject to taxation. By making all income earned and unearned at the mercy of the Medicare taxes I think it might be much fairer taxes.
Everyone pays not simply wage earners. The same thing should be achieved with interpersonal security. Sales fees are collected when you spend it. If you cannot spend all the money you then you pay the taxes never. The only way to tax the rich is to obtain it before they actually.
In these areas, the financial institution keeps the bulk of the service risk, and effective risk management is most important. Neither an intermediary nor a market maker are hedged against all risks perfectly, and therefore its investors tolerate an array of financial risks from the institution’s activities. You will find five generic dangers to these financial institutions: organized, credit, counterparty, operational, and legal.
- The trade or business of executing services as an employee
- 1953 forwards: U.S. Government 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rates (GS10 series)
- “Which stocks do I buy?”
- People who are unable to qualify for a loan will be required to rent
- 8 years ago from Irving, Texas
- ► Nov 22 (1)
- Active Investing
- Don’t outsource core competencies
Systematic risk is the chance of asset value change associated with systemic factors. Therefore, it can be hedged but cannot be varied completely. In fact, systematic risk can be seen as undiversifiable risk. Finance institutions assume this risk whenever possessions owned or statements issued can change in value as a result of broader financial conditions.
Systematic risk will come in many forms. For instance, as rates of interest change, different properties have different relatively, unpredictable beliefs. Energy prices influence transportation firms’ stock prices and real property values differently. Large-scale weather effects can highly influence both financial and real asset values for better or worse. Some finance institutions decompose organized risk minutely. Institutions whose balance sheets react substantially to specific systemic changes may try to estimate the impact of the particular systematic risks on performance, try to manage them, and thus limit their sensitivity to variations in these undiversifiable factors.